Comparing Agile Frameworks

Introduction


In the world of software development, agility is key. Just like constructing a house, you want a sturdy foundation, efficient processes, and flexibility to adapt to changes. Agile frameworks provide the blueprint for achieving these goals. In this article, we’ll compare five prominent agile frameworks: Adaptive Software Development, Lean Software Development, SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework), LeSS (Large Scale Scrum), and Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD). Let’s explore their main differences and the advantages they offer, using the metaphor of building a house to illustrate.

  1. Adaptive Software Development (ASD):
    ASD is like the architect who designs a unique house for each client. It focuses on flexibility and embraces changes during development. Just as the architect might modify the design based on client feedback, ASD welcomes evolving requirements. The advantage is adaptability, ensuring the software “house” fits the client’s needs perfectly.
  2. Lean Software Development (LSD):
    LSD is akin to lean construction techniques. It eliminates waste and prioritizes efficiency, ensuring that only what’s necessary is included. In the context of building a house, it means using the right materials in the right amounts, reducing costs, and speeding up construction. The advantage is cost-effectiveness and quicker delivery.
  3. SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework):
    SAFe operates like a large construction firm that manages multiple projects simultaneously. It coordinates various teams and ensures they work harmoniously to construct different parts of a grand estate. The advantage is streamlined coordination for large-scale software development efforts, much like orchestrating a complex construction project.
  4. LeSS (Large Scale Scrum):
    LeSS is similar to an agile construction crew, where small, cross-functional teams work collaboratively. Each team focuses on building a section of the house, and all teams synchronize their efforts regularly.
  5. This ensures that the entire “house” is constructed efficiently. The advantage is scalability and team collaboration for large projects.
  6. Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD):
    DAD resembles a construction company that offers a range of house-building services, from traditional to modern designs. It’s flexible and allows teams to choose the most appropriate practices and lifecycles for their specific project. Like a versatile construction firm, DAD adapts to various project needs. The advantage is versatility and tailoring the approach to suit specific project requirements.

Conclusion


Choosing the right agile framework for your software development project is like selecting the best construction approach for building a house. Each framework has its unique strengths and advantages, catering to different project sizes and needs. Whether you prefer the adaptability of ASD, the efficiency of LSD, the scalability of SAFe and LeSS, or the versatility of DAD, remember that the key is to build your “software house” on a solid foundation of agile principles. Just as a well-constructed house stands the test of time, a well-executed agile framework ensures the success of your software project in the ever-evolving landscape of technology.

About author

Karol Kordziński - Business AnalystI’m Karol Kordziński from Poland . I’m an analyst with a couple of years of experience. I’m the owner of ITGrowPartner where we help small- and medium-sized companies analyze projects.  But mainly I’m the owner of Product Core Lab. Saas tool to manage a product in the whole Product Lifecycle. With this tool, you can explain your product and processes in a structural method. We introduce you to how to model software products step by step